More than the past month we have been really impressed by the performance of the EPYC 7003 series Milan processors when on the lookout at the top rated-tier elements, but how does Zen 3 do for lower-tier server CPUs? Lately we had been provided with two EPYC 72F3 processors from AMD for these 8-main significant functionality SKUs. In our first glimpse at the EPYC 72F3 Linux general performance is seeing how they examine to the equivalent previous-era EPYC 7F32 processor.
With just getting our hands on the EPYC 72F3 processors for a handful of times, the first look is just some 1P testing as opposed to the EPYC 7F32 processor for wanting at the generational development with Zen 3. In the days/weeks ahead will be far more exams which includes the 2P benchmark success and additional comparison figures. By using OpenBenchmarking.org is also previously many comparison factors that can be made for those people interested.
The AMD EPYC 72F3 athletics the similar core/thread counts and just about the identical clock frequencies as the prior EPYC 7F32 processor. Each are eight cores / sixteen threads with a 3.7GHz foundation clock. Aside from Zen 2 vs. Zen 3, the other crucial variations are the new EPYC 72F3 sporting activities a 4.1GHz most raise clock speed as opposed to 3.9GHz with the EPYC 7F32 while also getting double the L3 cache at 256MB for the eight cores as opposed to 128MB with the past era element.
Other attributes in popular to these processors are each acquiring a 180 Watt TDP (while the 72F3 can also be configured down to 165 Watts or up to 200 Watts), 128 lanes of PCI Categorical 4., 8 channels of DDR4-3200, and other common features of the EPYC 7003 “Milan” collection.
So with the EPYC 72F3 you stop up with a Zen 3 server processor that has the same base clock as the former EPYC 7F32 but with a improve clock up to 200MHz increased and heading from 128MB to 256MB for the L3 cache. This F-Sequence for each-core optimized SKU carries a 1Ku record rate of $2468 USD, which is very respectable thinking of the EPYC 7F32 is nonetheless retailing for $2.2~2.5k dependent upon the retailer although originally launching last year at the $2100 value level.
For this preliminary benchmarking of the EPYC 72F3 1P configuration, the EPYC 7F32 vs. 73F3 had been analyzed on a Supermicro H12SSL-i motherboard that supports the two these Rome and Milan processors when updated to the most recent BIOS. Cooling these processors was the Dynatron A38.
Presented the the latest release of Ubuntu 21.04 “Hirsute Hippo” and the overall performance it brings, both equally of these processors had been examined on that newly-unveiled Linux distribution for featuring a search at the functionality with the most up-to-date Linux program — together with Linux 5.11. For this screening I also manually moved the compiler to a current GCC 11..1 improvement snapshot for getting the most up-to-date Znver3 (and Znver2) compiler aid.
This first AMD EPYC 72F3 Linux benchmarking is very a straight-ahead benchmarking comparison so let’s get straight to some figures.